The FunCaps Framework: Reconceptualizing Operational Alignment
Olfat GANJI BIDMESHK, Mohammad MEHRAEEN, Alireza POOYA, Yaghoob MAHARATI
Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Crosssectional Study
Anja ŽNIDARŠIČ, Alenka BAGGIA, Antonín PAVLÍČEK, Jakub FISCHER, Maciej ROSTAŃSKI, Borut WERBER
Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis
Vasja ROBLEK, Maja MEŠKO, Iztok PODBREGAR
Content Analysis of Gossip at Different Levels of a Hospital
Maryam BABAEI AGHBOLAGH, Farzad Sattari ARDABILI, Elena VOITENKO
Antecedents of Service Innovative Behavior: The Role of Spiritual Leadership and Workplace Spirituality
Hebah Suliman ALFARAJAT, Okechukwu Lawrence EMEAGWALI
Narcissistic Leadership and Workplace Deviance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Aggression and Workplace Hostility
Hussein Hurajah ALHASNAWI, Ali Abdulhassan ABBAS
In Memoriam
In Memoriam
Iztok Podbregar
The FunCaps Framework: Reconceptualizing Operational Alignment
Olfat GANJI BIDMESHK
Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Management Information Systems, Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Mohammad MEHRAEEN
Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran; Department of Information Systems, DeGroote School of Business, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
Alireza POOYA
Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
Yaghoob MAHARATI
Department of Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Operational alignment, the alignment between business processes (BPs) and information systems (ISs), is a well-acknowledged requirement for improving business efficiency. However, a lack of sound foundation for the practical implementation of operational alignment remains in the existing literature. This is, in part, because previously developed coarse-grained strategic alignment models for operational alignment have overlooked the differences between strategic and operational levels of alignment. Additionally, while some studies have recognized these differences, they remain limited. This is partly due to their negligence of the IS’s socio-technical nature or their focus on identifying the social antecedents and their effect on operational alignment, without considering how ISs meet the business requirements in achieving operational alignment. To overcome this potential lack of applicability, the purpose of this paper is to determine the right level of abstraction for describing BPs and ISs and reconceptualizing operational alignment. Methodology: This paper conducts empirical research using a grounded theory (GT), centering on semi-structured interviews with 28 experts involved in the Iranian top public universities. Data were analyzed by using MAXQDA software. Results: The resulting FunCaps framework specifies the required combinations of BP functions and IS capabilities for operational alignment. Conclusion: FunCaps reconceptualizes operational alignment based on operational planning and reciprocal integration and establishes the broader picture by considering an IS as a socio-technical system.
Keywords: Operational alignment, information system, business process, socio-technical system, grounded theory
Are we Ready to Use Microchip Implants? An International Crosssectional Study
Anja ŽNIDARŠIČ
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
Alenka BAGGIA
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
Antonín PAVLÍČEK
Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic
Jakub FISCHER
Faculty of Informatics and Statistics, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czech Republic
Maciej ROSTAŃSKI
Faculty of Computer Science, Academy of Business in Dabrowa Gornicza, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Poland
Borut WERBER
Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor, Kranj, Slovenia
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Despite their clear relevance to human life, microchip implants are still widely viewed as negative, threatening our privacy and raising growing concerns about our health. This paper aims to investigate the important factors influencing people’s perception of microchip implants and their willingness to use them for different purposes. Methodology: The cross-sectional study was conducted in three European countries and the data were analysed using the group Structural Equation Modeling approach. Only complete answers to the online survey questionnaire items were used representing a convenience sample of 804 respondents. Results: The results show that perceived ease of use, usefulness and perceived trust are significant predictors of intention to use microchip implants. Perceived trust is influenced by privacy and technology safety. Concerns about painful procedures and other health concerns reduce the perceived usefulness of microchip implants. Apart from the predictor health concerns, the results were similar in all countries. Conclusion: Based on the presented results, researchers interested in investigating the actual use of microchip implants can establish a solid foundation for their research. The results may assist policy makers in developing the regulations to ensure the safe use of microchip implants and allow for a higher level of security. As a follow-up, investigation of changes in the acceptance of microchip implants following the threat of a global pandemic is proposed.
Keywords: Microchip implant, Near field communication, Behavioural intentions, Structural equation model, Technology acceptance model
Mapping of the Emergence of Society 5.0: A Bibliometric Analysis
Vasja ROBLEK
Faculty of Organisation Studies, Novo mesto
Maja MEŠKO
University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj, Slovenia
Iztok PODBREGAR
University of Maribor, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Kranj, Slovenia
Abstract
Background/Purpose: The study aims to answer a research question: With which essential cornerstones technological innovations the transformation from Society 4.0 and Industry 4.0 to Society 5.0 and Industry 5.0 is enabled? The study is important for practitioners and researchers to understand the meaning of Society 5.0 and to familiarise themselves with the drivers that will help shape Society 5.0 policies and play an important role in its further development. Therefore, the authors conducted a quantitative bibliometric study that provides insights into the importance of the topic and incorporates current characteristics and future research trends. Methodology: The study used algorithmic co-occurrence of keywords to gain a different insight into the evolution of Society 5.0. Thirty-six selected articles from the Web of Science database were analysed with the bibliometric analysis and overlay visualisation. Results: The co-occurrence analysis shows that terms artificial intelligence, cyber-physical systems, big data, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, open innovation, Society 5.0, super-smart society have been widely used in researches in the last three years. Conclusion: The study presents a bibliometric analysis to analyse the current and future development drivers of a Society 5.0. According to the results, the transition from Society 4.0 to Society 5.0 can be achieved by implementing knowledge and technologies in the IoT, robotics, and Big Data to transform society into a smart society (Society 5.0). In particular, the concept would enable the adaptation of services and industrial activities to individuals’ real needs. Furthermore, these technologies allow advanced digital service platforms that will eventually be integrated into all areas of life.
Keywords: Society 5.0, Industry 5.0, Information society, Smart society, Data-driven innovations
Content Analysis of Gossip at Different Levels of a Hospital
Maryam BABAEI AGHBOLAGH
Department of Management, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
Farzad Sattari ARDABILI
Department of Management, Ardabil Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ardabil, Iran
Elena VOITENKO
Department of Psychology, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Most societies have a negative attitude toward gossip and managers are concerned about the impact of gossips on the communication in an organizational environment. Our study examined the perception of gossip, and the context of gossip at different levels of a hospital, a case of organization with high communicational relation among staff. Also, the differences between the gossip context within the organizational context and within the social environment have been considered. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 27 informants, 9 in each of three groups: nurses, supervisors and managers of the Hospital. Recorded interviews were analyzed using content analysis, and results for each group of respondents were compared. Finally, the main gossiping issues for each group were categorized. Results: The study revealed that the topics of gossip in a hospital can be divided into eight main categories, and 34 sub-categories all identifiable by special topics. These main topics included confidentiality issues, merits, financial status/standing, personal characteristics, position, communications, biography, and job conditions. In terms of organizational gossip, a person’s merit in the workplace and financial standing were of particular interest to the participants of this study. Also, the gossip topics at different levels among nurses, administrators, and managers had significant differences. Conclusion: Managers should acknowledge different gossip contents among people at different organizational levels, and that employees do not have the same motives for communication at different organizational levels. Additionally, the distances between contents in the Tendency to Gossip Questionnaire and categories in the organizational environment need more studies, to explore precedents and outputs. Managers may use these findings to facilitate organizational change and communication.
Keywords: Gossip in organizations, Construct of gossip, Content analysis, Informal communication
Antecedents of Service Innovative Behavior: The Role of Spiritual Leadership and Workplace Spirituality
Hebah Suliman ALFARAJAT
Girne American University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Girne, Cyprus
Okechukwu Lawrence EMEAGWALI
Girne American University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Girne, Cyprus
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Managers in labor-intensive industries are facing challenges on how to encourage innovation, as services are mostly offered by employees and not machines. Intense competition in the service and hospitality industry calls for more innovative work behavior exhibition among employees, and the question on how enterprises can nurture innovative behavior remains unanswered. The objective of the research is to clarify the inter-relationship between spiritual leadership and workplace spirituality and how their collective effect can nurture employee service innovative behavior in the hospitality industry by drawing on relational energy theory. Methodology: Data were obtained using a survey quantitative research method based on a convenience sampling technique from (n = 867) employees working in four- and five-star Jordanian hotels. A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique was applied to assess the proposed research model and hypotheses. Results: Findings from PLS-SEM show that spiritual leadership impacts and increases the level of workplace spirituality and service innovative behavior among employees. Workplace spirituality increases the level of service innovative behavior and mediates the relationship between spiritual leadership and service innovative behavior. Conclusion: Spiritual leadership and workplace spirituality initiatives and practices can be beneficial for hospitality enterprises in terms of service innovative behavior. Moreover, the key point is that hospitality HR practitioners should not only focus on selecting, training, and appointing leaders with spiritual characteristics, but also on creating a spiritual work atmosphere to enable employees to exhibit service innovative behaviors. The results did not only advance our knowledge concerning the nexus and importance of spirituality in the workplace, but also validates and reveals the importance of spirituality on innovative behavior in the Arabian context.
Narcissistic Leadership and Workplace Deviance: A Moderated Mediation Model of Organizational Aggression and Workplace Hostility
Hussein Hurajah ALHASNAWI
University of Kerbala, College of Administration and Economics, Business Administration Department, Kerbala, Iraq
Ali Abdulhassan ABBAS
University of Kerbala, College of Administration and Economics, Department of Accounting, Kerbala, Iraq
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Workplace Deviance are among the most common phenomena observed in organizations. This might be attributed to narcissistic style of leadership and the manifestations of organizational aggression. It is further aggravated by increased workplace hostility. The main purpose of this research is to observe the impact of moderated mediation of organizational aggression and workplace hostility upon the relationship between narcissistic leadership and workplace deviance.
Methodology: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted using self-survey method. With 673 participants in the study, the author used an electronic questionnaire (Google Forms) to collect data from employees working at five food product companies in Iraq. Mediation model, moderation analysis, and moderated mediation models were evaluated using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for which AMOS V.23 software was used. Results inferred that organizational aggression partially mediates a positive relationship between narcissistic leadership and workplace deviance. Further, the relationship between organizational aggression and workplace deviance depends on the changes in level of workplace hostility. Moreover, the study empirically supports the fundamentals of moderated mediation model. In other terms, the study infers that indirect effect of narcissistic leadership in workplace deviance through organizational aggression has been significantly moderated by workplace hostility. Conclusion: When leaders adopt narcissistic behaviors to achieve their personal interests, it leads to increased organizational aggression and workplace deviance that eventually increase the levels of workplace hostility. Accordingly, moderated mediation model provides a better understanding about how narcissistic leadership, organizational aggression, and workplace hostility all work together to influence workplace deviance.
University of Maribor Faculty of Organizational Sciences
Abstract
Background/Purpose: Workplace Deviance are among the most common phenomena observed in organizations. This might be attributed to narcissistic style of leadership and the manifestations of organizational aggression. It is further aggravated by increased workplace hostility. The main purpose of this research is to observe the impact of moderated mediation of organizational aggression and workplace hostility upon the relationship between narcissistic leadership and workplace deviance.
Methodology: A cross-sectional investigation was conducted using self-survey method. With 673 participants in the study, the author used an electronic questionnaire (Google Forms) to collect data from employees working at five food product companies in Iraq. Mediation model, moderation analysis, and moderated mediation models were evaluated using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for which AMOS V.23 software was used. Results inferred that organizational aggression partially mediates a positive relationship between narcissistic leadership and workplace deviance. Further, the relationship between organizational aggression and workplace deviance depends on the changes in level of workplace hostility. Moreover, the study empirically supports the fundamentals of moderated mediation model. In other terms, the study infers that indirect effect of narcissistic leadership in workplace deviance through organizational aggression has been significantly moderated by workplace hostility. Conclusion: When leaders adopt narcissistic behaviors to achieve their personal interests, it leads to increased organizational aggression and workplace deviance that eventually increase the levels of workplace hostility. Accordingly, moderated mediation model provides a better understanding about how narcissistic leadership, organizational aggression, and workplace hostility all work together to influence workplace deviance.